Возможно в ближайшем будущем у нас не будет принца Арчи и принцессы Лилибет, а будут принцОгендеры нейтрального пола - арчуткО и лилибеткО.
Словов нет, из мыслей озвучивать можно только предлоги, да и то не все
Смотрите видео ниже, чтобы узнать, как установить наш сайт в качестве веб-приложения на домашнем экране.
Примечание: Эта возможность может быть недоступна в некоторых браузерах.
С уважением, ROYALS
С уважением, ROYALS.
Возможно в ближайшем будущем у нас не будет принца Арчи и принцессы Лилибет, а будут принцОгендеры нейтрального пола - арчуткО и лилибеткО.
Словов нет, из мыслей озвучивать можно только предлоги, да и то не все
Такой связью, я полагаю, сейчас мало кого удивишь. У нас, например, в славном граде Санта-Барбара были свои "лазутчики". Немало интересненьких подробностей было узнано из этих источников, например. что там, в этой самой Санте-Барбаре монтесятами интересовались только сильно пигментированные дамы с кучей детей и проблем. Теперь, увы, с изменением некоторых обстоятельств объективной действительности наши контакты сведены до минимума.И такая же прямая связь с некоторыми городами благословенного рая в Калифорниях.
Означает ли это, что нам предстоит лицезреть на коронации принцессо Арчи в бальном платье?Леди, к сожалению очень занята сейчас, но хочу вас »порадовать» очередными новостями от принцессы Генриетты Маркл и ее супружника. Статья из Телеграф, копирую как есть, переводится легко через гугл.
Prince Harry and Meghan back group that accuses parents of ‘gendering’ unborn children
Archetypes podcast has partnership with Global Boyhood Initiative which encourages primary school children to question ‘gender norms’
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are baca campaign group wor
in UK schools that accuses parents of “gendering” their unborn children.
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan’s podcast, Archetypes, has a partnership with the Global Boyhood Initiative, a group which aims to “promote gender equity by fostering positive masculinity in boys and men”.
The Global Boyhood Initiative has created a curriculum which is being piloted in London schools and encourages primary school children to question “gender norms”.
“The State of UK Boys”, a report published last year by the group, suggested that families and schools are “gender and heterosexuality ‘factories’” and gender is “not tied to sex organs”.
The report also states that “parents may begin gendering their children even before birth based on the identification of external genitalia in scans, including through elaborate ‘gender reveal’ parties and a stream of purchases along gender lines”.
It adds: “While the family is a place of nurturing and support for many children, it can also be where gender and sexuality are regulated and policed, as many of our interviewees and much research suggest.”
'Boys will be boys'
The report argues that the statement “boys will be boys” could be dangerous. It objects to public representations of boys and boyhood as “in opposition to and distinct from girls and as naturally predisposed to behave in particular ways”.
It said that “this fixed conception is particularly problematic when it implies that male violence or harassment of women springs from innate impulses”.
David Bartlett, a co-author of the report, is the project lead on the group’s UK initiative, which argues that “we need a generation of boys who are not influenced by restrictive gender stereotypes” and “can build and sustain healthy, respectful, caring relationships”.
The curriculum, which the group hopes to roll out in schools across the UK, is designed to be taught in relationships and sex education lessons.
Children aged between seven and 11 will learn about “the role gender norms play in their lives through activity-based questioning and critical reflection,” according to the group’s website. They will also be encouraged to “explore equitable, inclusive and nonviolent attitudes and behaviours in a safe and comfortable space” and “internalise these new gender attitudes and norms by applying them in their relationships and lives”.
'Extreme position on gender ideology'
It comes amid a reported rise in demand from schools seeto address “toxic masculinity” and misogyny in the wake of toxic influencers such as Andrew Tate.
However, concerns have been raised about external groups teaching about relationships and sex education in schools.
Miriam Cates, the Conservative MP, said she was worried that a stated aim of the Global Boyhood Initiative’s relationships and sex education curriculum was to train young children to become “agents of change for gender and social justice”.
She said: “Attempting to ‘re-educate’ small children for reasons of political activism is indoctrination and an abuse of the trust that children place in teachers and parents place in schools.”
She added: “It is also concerning that the Global Boyhood Initiative says they have widened their net to include ‘children of all genders’, which suggests they hold to an extreme position on gender ideology.”
Tanya Carter, of Safe Schools Alliance UK, said: “Children are male or female, boys or girls. We don’t understand why a school would need to get an outside agency in to challenge gender stereotypes in a primary school. This is done very simply by ensuring all children get equal access to resources and that no activities are deemed ‘for boys’ or ‘for girls’.
“Of course children shouldn’t be limited by their sex in a primary school and gender stereotypes should be challenged, but this is school culture stuff. Schools must be very careful that anything delivered to children is for their benefit and not because adults want to spread their particular worldview.”
The partnership between Archetypes and the Global Boyhood Initiative includes guides on how to coach boys on healthy masculinity, and how men can be an “ally” in the home and workplace. Archetypes is not a partner with the campaign group’s schools curriculum programme.
The Global Boyhood Initiative was founded in 2020 by Equimundo, a US-based gender equality group and the Kering Foundation, a French violence against women foundation.
Archewell was approached for comment.
Леди, к сожалению очень занята сейчас, но хочу вас »порадовать» очередными новостями от принцессы Генриетты Маркл и ее супружника. Статья из Телеграф, копирую как есть, переводится легко через гугл.
Prince Harry and Meghan back group that accuses parents of ‘gendering’ unborn children
Archetypes podcast has partnership with Global Boyhood Initiative which encourages primary school children to question ‘gender norms’
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are baca campaign group wor
in UK schools that accuses parents of “gendering” their unborn children.
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan’s podcast, Archetypes, has a partnership with the Global Boyhood Initiative, a group which aims to “promote gender equity by fostering positive masculinity in boys and men”.
The Global Boyhood Initiative has created a curriculum which is being piloted in London schools and encourages primary school children to question “gender norms”.
“The State of UK Boys”, a report published last year by the group, suggested that families and schools are “gender and heterosexuality ‘factories’” and gender is “not tied to sex organs”.
The report also states that “parents may begin gendering their children even before birth based on the identification of external genitalia in scans, including through elaborate ‘gender reveal’ parties and a stream of purchases along gender lines”.
It adds: “While the family is a place of nurturing and support for many children, it can also be where gender and sexuality are regulated and policed, as many of our interviewees and much research suggest.”
'Boys will be boys'
The report argues that the statement “boys will be boys” could be dangerous. It objects to public representations of boys and boyhood as “in opposition to and distinct from girls and as naturally predisposed to behave in particular ways”.
It said that “this fixed conception is particularly problematic when it implies that male violence or harassment of women springs from innate impulses”.
David Bartlett, a co-author of the report, is the project lead on the group’s UK initiative, which argues that “we need a generation of boys who are not influenced by restrictive gender stereotypes” and “can build and sustain healthy, respectful, caring relationships”.
The curriculum, which the group hopes to roll out in schools across the UK, is designed to be taught in relationships and sex education lessons.
Children aged between seven and 11 will learn about “the role gender norms play in their lives through activity-based questioning and critical reflection,” according to the group’s website. They will also be encouraged to “explore equitable, inclusive and nonviolent attitudes and behaviours in a safe and comfortable space” and “internalise these new gender attitudes and norms by applying them in their relationships and lives”.
'Extreme position on gender ideology'
It comes amid a reported rise in demand from schools seeto address “toxic masculinity” and misogyny in the wake of toxic influencers such as Andrew Tate.
However, concerns have been raised about external groups teaching about relationships and sex education in schools.
Miriam Cates, the Conservative MP, said she was worried that a stated aim of the Global Boyhood Initiative’s relationships and sex education curriculum was to train young children to become “agents of change for gender and social justice”.
She said: “Attempting to ‘re-educate’ small children for reasons of political activism is indoctrination and an abuse of the trust that children place in teachers and parents place in schools.”
She added: “It is also concerning that the Global Boyhood Initiative says they have widened their net to include ‘children of all genders’, which suggests they hold to an extreme position on gender ideology.”
Tanya Carter, of Safe Schools Alliance UK, said: “Children are male or female, boys or girls. We don’t understand why a school would need to get an outside agency in to challenge gender stereotypes in a primary school. This is done very simply by ensuring all children get equal access to resources and that no activities are deemed ‘for boys’ or ‘for girls’.
“Of course children shouldn’t be limited by their sex in a primary school and gender stereotypes should be challenged, but this is school culture stuff. Schools must be very careful that anything delivered to children is for their benefit and not because adults want to spread their particular worldview.”
The partnership between Archetypes and the Global Boyhood Initiative includes guides on how to coach boys on healthy masculinity, and how men can be an “ally” in the home and workplace. Archetypes is not a partner with the campaign group’s schools curriculum programme.
The Global Boyhood Initiative was founded in 2020 by Equimundo, a US-based gender equality group and the Kering Foundation, a French violence against women foundation.
Archewell was approached for comment.
Ой, мне кажется, что на словах наши королевичи всю эту муть поддерживают, но вот в отношении своих необыкновенных детей вряд ли будут столь продвинуты. Лицемерие, как мы знаем, одно из "достоинств" феминистов-реформаторов. Любит Маркл юзать модные темы, быть на слуху - наше фсё. Порой не важно о чём вещаем, главное чтобы с умным видом и все активно восхищались!Возможно в ближайшем будущем у нас не будет принца Арчи и принцессы Лилибет, а будут принцОгендеры нейтрального пола - арчуткО и лилибеткО.
Не знаю, что за автор, верить-не верить. Прогнулись?
"По информации журналистов Daily Mail, принцу Арчи и принцессе Лилибет позволят появиться на коронации и сделают отдельное приглашение в том случае, если Меган и Гарри заранее подтвердят то, что малыши действительно будут участвовать в торжествах по этому поводу. Даже интересно, пойдут ли на подобное супруги, которые не раз утверждали, что хотят обеспечить наследникам свободное детство за пределами объективов папарацци."
Дарю ей идею. Активно поддерживая гендерезацию, Меган и Гарри себя бы объявили не теми, кто они есть по гендерным признакам. И в таком виде заявиться на коронацию к папе Карло - Гарри в платье и шляпке на каблуках, а Меган без своего побитого молью парика во фрачной паре. Вот точно, с месяц бы не сходили с первых полос.Любит Маркл юзать модные темы, быть на слуху - наше фсё
Тока штоб с сегодняшнего дня бороду не брил и не чесал.Гарри в платье и шляпке на каблуках,
А этой надо наряд, чтоб спереди штаны, а сзади платье. Можно к красному платью на лямках спереди пришить тот бордовый драповый костюм. И корону на голову побольше.Меган без своего побитого молью парика во фрачной паре.
Не поняла, Мегарики собираются потом каминг аут совершить, раз лезут в эту тему?!Леди, к сожалению очень занята сейчас, но хочу вас »порадовать» очередными новостями от принцессы Генриетты Маркл и ее супружника. Статья из Телеграф, копирую как есть, переводится легко через гугл.
Prince Harry and Meghan back group that accuses parents of ‘gendering’ unborn children
Archetypes podcast has partnership with Global Boyhood Initiative which encourages primary school children to question ‘gender norms’
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are baca campaign group wor
in UK schools that accuses parents of “gendering” their unborn children.
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan’s podcast, Archetypes, has a partnership with the Global Boyhood Initiative, a group which aims to “promote gender equity by fostering positive masculinity in boys and men”.
The Global Boyhood Initiative has created a curriculum which is being piloted in London schools and encourages primary school children to question “gender norms”.
“The State of UK Boys”, a report published last year by the group, suggested that families and schools are “gender and heterosexuality ‘factories’” and gender is “not tied to sex organs”.
The report also states that “parents may begin gendering their children even before birth based on the identification of external genitalia in scans, including through elaborate ‘gender reveal’ parties and a stream of purchases along gender lines”.
It adds: “While the family is a place of nurturing and support for many children, it can also be where gender and sexuality are regulated and policed, as many of our interviewees and much research suggest.”
'Boys will be boys'
The report argues that the statement “boys will be boys” could be dangerous. It objects to public representations of boys and boyhood as “in opposition to and distinct from girls and as naturally predisposed to behave in particular ways”.
It said that “this fixed conception is particularly problematic when it implies that male violence or harassment of women springs from innate impulses”.
David Bartlett, a co-author of the report, is the project lead on the group’s UK initiative, which argues that “we need a generation of boys who are not influenced by restrictive gender stereotypes” and “can build and sustain healthy, respectful, caring relationships”.
The curriculum, which the group hopes to roll out in schools across the UK, is designed to be taught in relationships and sex education lessons.
Children aged between seven and 11 will learn about “the role gender norms play in their lives through activity-based questioning and critical reflection,” according to the group’s website. They will also be encouraged to “explore equitable, inclusive and nonviolent attitudes and behaviours in a safe and comfortable space” and “internalise these new gender attitudes and norms by applying them in their relationships and lives”.
'Extreme position on gender ideology'
It comes amid a reported rise in demand from schools seeto address “toxic masculinity” and misogyny in the wake of toxic influencers such as Andrew Tate.
However, concerns have been raised about external groups teaching about relationships and sex education in schools.
Miriam Cates, the Conservative MP, said she was worried that a stated aim of the Global Boyhood Initiative’s relationships and sex education curriculum was to train young children to become “agents of change for gender and social justice”.
She said: “Attempting to ‘re-educate’ small children for reasons of political activism is indoctrination and an abuse of the trust that children place in teachers and parents place in schools.”
She added: “It is also concerning that the Global Boyhood Initiative says they have widened their net to include ‘children of all genders’, which suggests they hold to an extreme position on gender ideology.”
Tanya Carter, of Safe Schools Alliance UK, said: “Children are male or female, boys or girls. We don’t understand why a school would need to get an outside agency in to challenge gender stereotypes in a primary school. This is done very simply by ensuring all children get equal access to resources and that no activities are deemed ‘for boys’ or ‘for girls’.
“Of course children shouldn’t be limited by their sex in a primary school and gender stereotypes should be challenged, but this is school culture stuff. Schools must be very careful that anything delivered to children is for their benefit and not because adults want to spread their particular worldview.”
The partnership between Archetypes and the Global Boyhood Initiative includes guides on how to coach boys on healthy masculinity, and how men can be an “ally” in the home and workplace. Archetypes is not a partner with the campaign group’s schools curriculum programme.
The Global Boyhood Initiative was founded in 2020 by Equimundo, a US-based gender equality group and the Kering Foundation, a French violence against women foundation.
Archewell was approached for comment.
Полами меняться будут, по-моему и так понятно у кого в этой паре есть яйца)Не поняла, Мегарики собираются потом каминг аут совершить, раз лезут в эту тему?!
А потом очередное интервью Опре. О том, как гадкая БКС вставляла палки в колеса несчастным мегарикам, мешала им выразить свою сущность. А они, бедные, мучались, аппетит потеряли, ночами не спали. И только теперь, свободные и независимые,наконец, они смогли признаться. А там и в суд на папу-консерватора можно подать за ущемление прав. А че такова.Не поняла, Мегарики собираются потом каминг аут совершить, раз лезут в эту тему?!
Зашла я в этой статье по ссылке на статью за вчера о какой-то особой роли Луи в церемонии коронации. Увидела фото - поняла, что просто должна его принести. Читаем подпись под фото!!!Молодец дядька, страна должна знать своих героев. Надо бы ещё дословно пересказать, что орал херцаг Сассекс.
Ещё кричал "Карету мне, карету", типа "сюда я больше не ездок. Бегу, не оглянусь, пойду искать по свету, Где оскорблённому есть чувству уголок!.."
Сами догадаетесь зачем. Как выяснилось, принц довольно дерзко вмешивается в сценарий мероприятия, которое будет смотреть по некоторым оценкам около 1,9 миллиарда зрителей онлайн.
Дело в том, что принц знает лично главного ответственного за ритуал и «рассадку-расстановку».
Это первый герцог Англии, первый граф Англии Эдвард, 18-й герцог Норфолк.
![]()
герцог Эдвард и его жена
На минуточку справка о его статусе:
![]()
герцог и его замок
Человек такого статуса не просто онемел от приказного тона Гарольда, но потом и поделился своими впечатлениями от «разговора» с молодым герцогом, которого помнит еще в подгузниках.
Гарри пытался выяснить сценарий в той части, где присутствуют дети Уильяма, я писала об этом вчера.
Младшему из Уэльских расписали особенную роль на коронации
СТИЛЬ МОДА ТРЕНДЫВчера
Далее была истерика по поводу появления на балконе Букингемского дворца и проезда перед подданными в карете.
![]()
Герцог Эдвард пытался объяснить герцогу Сассекскому, что на балконе, в каретах появятся лишь работающие члены королевской семьи. Возможно, и то не все! Пока по сценарию весь акцент будет сделан на Чарльзе с Камиллой и семье принца Уэльского. Принц Гарри был в ярости и требовал к себе и Меган такого же отношения и статуса в мероприятиях, как и к брату. Разговора не получилось.![]()
Принц Гарри звонил авторам сценария коронации
Сами догадаетесь зачем. Как выяснилось, принц довольно дерзко вмешивается в сценарий мероприятия, которое будет смотреть по некоторым оценкам около 1,9 миллиарда зрителей онлайн.dzen.ru
А чем чёрт не шутит. Жизнь - она штука длинная и непредсказуемаяУвидела фото - поняла, что просто должна его принести. Читаем подпись под фото!!!
И под статьей ответ авторки на вопросы с чего это Луи будущий король:Зашла я в этой статье по ссылке на статью за вчера о какой-то особой роли Луи в церемонии коронации. Увидела фото - поняла, что просто должна его принести. Читаем подпись под фото!!!![]()
![]()
- Помимо приготовленного блендером овощного супа, ее фирменными блюдами были простая паста, жареный цыпленок, гамбургеры на гриле и стейк. Остальная еда покупалась в готовом виде. Вместо того, чтобы готовить, она представляла себе, как ведет телепрограмму, чтобы объехать весь мир, дегустируя еду. Короткое видео о ее дегустации солений в Бруклине для Ora TV (проект Ларри Кинга, популярного американского телеведущего, основанный в 2012 году - авт.) показало ее ограниченность. Не было ни магии, ни магнетизма.
- Мы здесь делаем что-то необычное, люди никогда бы и не подумали об этом. Речь идет о салате на гриле!
Какие-то, простите, немного арабские детки.Хм... Чё то то генератор барахлит...
Детей конечно симпатичных сгенерировал, но это вообще ни каким боком ни Мигрень ни Уилл.
Про сходство с Дианой промолчу...
Я ж не слепая, не?
Сама-то жрёть по пятницам не веганскоеДобыл где то колбасы и вина, ушел в глухое подполье. Достал его веганский ЗОЖ с овсяной бурдой. Хоть наестся в кой то веки.
Вот, потому то маман свою она вперёд объявлен от Гаврилы вытащила, чтоб знали, что расово правильная и обижать низя.Но она реально выглядела как латинос. Я, пока маму Дорию не увидела, и не предполагала, что утка негритянские корни имеет.
Ой, кмк, если бы он сразу тогда порассказал, то был бы обвинён ею да ещё и с протекцией мужа и, возможно, что КС сама бы замела под ковёр. А тут, на ниве того, что только человек, который о них ничего не слышал, не может назвать их токсичными, время то вполне удачное.Думаю,если новая семья сочтет дело прибыльным ,то мы ещё получим удовольствие от фильма или книги Тревора!
Таки пусть Карл то поучаствует. Не просим, а требуем. А мы чего хотим, то и получаемСассексы "настаивают на участии" в коронации короля Чарльза, поскольку инсайдеры опасаются "хаоса" на фоне требований
ПИПЕЦЛеди, к сожалению очень занята сейчас, но хочу вас »порадовать» очередными новостями от принцессы Генриетты Маркл и ее супружника. Статья из Телеграф, копирую как есть, переводится легко через гугл.
Prince Harry and Meghan back group that accuses parents of ‘gendering’ unborn children
Archetypes podcast has partnership with Global Boyhood Initiative which encourages primary school children to question ‘gender norms’
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are baca campaign group wor
in UK schools that accuses parents of “gendering” their unborn children.
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan’s podcast, Archetypes, has a partnership with the Global Boyhood Initiative, a group which aims to “promote gender equity by fostering positive masculinity in boys and men”.
The Global Boyhood Initiative has created a curriculum which is being piloted in London schools and encourages primary school children to question “gender norms”.
“The State of UK Boys”, a report published last year by the group, suggested that families and schools are “gender and heterosexuality ‘factories’” and gender is “not tied to sex organs”.
The report also states that “parents may begin gendering their children even before birth based on the identification of external genitalia in scans, including through elaborate ‘gender reveal’ parties and a stream of purchases along gender lines”.
It adds: “While the family is a place of nurturing and support for many children, it can also be where gender and sexuality are regulated and policed, as many of our interviewees and much research suggest.”
'Boys will be boys'
The report argues that the statement “boys will be boys” could be dangerous. It objects to public representations of boys and boyhood as “in opposition to and distinct from girls and as naturally predisposed to behave in particular ways”.
It said that “this fixed conception is particularly problematic when it implies that male violence or harassment of women springs from innate impulses”.
David Bartlett, a co-author of the report, is the project lead on the group’s UK initiative, which argues that “we need a generation of boys who are not influenced by restrictive gender stereotypes” and “can build and sustain healthy, respectful, caring relationships”.
The curriculum, which the group hopes to roll out in schools across the UK, is designed to be taught in relationships and sex education lessons.
Children aged between seven and 11 will learn about “the role gender norms play in their lives through activity-based questioning and critical reflection,” according to the group’s website. They will also be encouraged to “explore equitable, inclusive and nonviolent attitudes and behaviours in a safe and comfortable space” and “internalise these new gender attitudes and norms by applying them in their relationships and lives”.
'Extreme position on gender ideology'
It comes amid a reported rise in demand from schools seeto address “toxic masculinity” and misogyny in the wake of toxic influencers such as Andrew Tate.
However, concerns have been raised about external groups teaching about relationships and sex education in schools.
Miriam Cates, the Conservative MP, said she was worried that a stated aim of the Global Boyhood Initiative’s relationships and sex education curriculum was to train young children to become “agents of change for gender and social justice”.
She said: “Attempting to ‘re-educate’ small children for reasons of political activism is indoctrination and an abuse of the trust that children place in teachers and parents place in schools.”
She added: “It is also concerning that the Global Boyhood Initiative says they have widened their net to include ‘children of all genders’, which suggests they hold to an extreme position on gender ideology.”
Tanya Carter, of Safe Schools Alliance UK, said: “Children are male or female, boys or girls. We don’t understand why a school would need to get an outside agency in to challenge gender stereotypes in a primary school. This is done very simply by ensuring all children get equal access to resources and that no activities are deemed ‘for boys’ or ‘for girls’.
“Of course children shouldn’t be limited by their sex in a primary school and gender stereotypes should be challenged, but this is school culture stuff. Schools must be very careful that anything delivered to children is for their benefit and not because adults want to spread their particular worldview.”
The partnership between Archetypes and the Global Boyhood Initiative includes guides on how to coach boys on healthy masculinity, and how men can be an “ally” in the home and workplace. Archetypes is not a partner with the campaign group’s schools curriculum programme.
The Global Boyhood Initiative was founded in 2020 by Equimundo, a US-based gender equality group and the Kering Foundation, a French violence against women foundation.
Archewell was approached for comment.